Functional dioecy and moth pollination in Cabralea canjerana subsp. canjerana (Meliaceae)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14522/darwiniana.2015.31.599Keywords:
Atlantic Forest, phalaenophily, plant sexual dimorphismAbstract
Cabralea canjerana subsp. canjerana is a common species in the Atlantic Forest, occurring in several areas of this biome. Yet, little is known about its reproductive strategies. This study aims to understand the reproductive biology of this subspecies, including floral biology, sexual system, and pollination biology. Male and female plants have morphologically similar flowers, but male plants have larger inflorescences with more flowers than female plants. Female flowers remain open and receptive for two days, whereas male flowers last only one day; thus, compensating for the imbalance of the number of flowers per plant between the two sexes. Morphologically similar male and female flowers, as observed in C. canjerana subsp. canjerana, are rare among dioecious species. The high frequency of moths visiting the flowers, the timing of flower opening (anthesis) and the production of nectar suggest that moths are the pollinators of this subspecies. In contrast to the floral dimorphism found in C. canjerana subsp. polytrica, variations in floral morphology are unrelated to the plant sex in subsp. canjerana. This and other results found in this study suggest that the subspecies of C. canjerana might be different species.
References
Barrett, S. C. H. 1992. Heterostylous genetic polymorphisms: model systems for evolutionary analysis, in S. C. H. Barrett (ed.), Evolution and function of heterostyly, pp. 1-24. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86656-2_1
Barrett, S. C. H. & J. Hough. 2013. Sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 64(1): 67-82. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers308
Bawa, K. S. 1980a. Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 15-39. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.000311
Bawa, K. S. 1980b. Mimicry of male by female flower and intrasexual competition for pollinators in Jacaratia dolichaula (D. Smith) woodson (Caricaceae). Evolution 34: 467-474. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2408216
Bawa, K. S. & P. A. Opler. 1975. Dioecism in tropical forest trees. Evolution 29: 167-179. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2407150
Bezerra, E. L. S. & I. C. Machado. 2003. Floral biology and pollination system of Solanum stramonifolium Jacq. (Solanaceae) in remaining of Atlantic Forest, Pernambuco. Acta Botanica Brasilica 17: 247-257. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062003000200007
Carmo, R. M. 2005. Biologia reprodutiva de Cabralea canjerana subsp. canjerana em fragmentos de Mata Atlântica do sul do estado Minas Gerais. Ph.D thesis, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Charlesworth, B. & D. Charlesworth. 1978. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. The American Naturalist 112: 975-997. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/283342
Cruden, R. W. 1977. Polen-ovule ratios: a conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants. Evolution 31: 32-46. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2407542
Cruden, R. W. 1988. Temporal dioecism, systematic breadth, associated traits and temporal patterns. The Botanical Gazzete 149: 1-15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/337684
Dafni, A. 1992. Pollination Ecology: A practical Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Delph, L. F.; L. F. Galloway & M. Stanton. 1996. Sexual dimorphism in flower size. The American Naturalist 148(2): 299-320. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/285926
Delph, L. F.; J. L. Gehring, A. M. Arntz, M. Levri & F. M. Frey. 2005. Genetic correlations with floral display lead to sexual dimorphism in the cost of reproduction. The American Naturalist 166: 31-41. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/444597
Eckhart, V. M. 1999. Sexual dimorphism in flowers and inflorescences, in M. A. Geber, T. E. Dawson & L. F. Delph (eds.), Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants, pp. 123-148. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03908-3_5
Faegri, K. & L.Van Der Pijl. 1979. The Principles of Pollination Ecology. New York: Pergamon Press.
França, G. S. & J. R. Stehmann. 2004. Floristic composition and structure of the tree component of a forest in the municipality of altimontana Camanducaia, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Botany 27: 19-30. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-84042004000100003
Freeman, C. D.; J. L. Doust, A. El-Keblawy, M. J. Kathleen & E. D. Mcarthur. 1997. Sexual specialization and inbreeding avoidance in the evolution of dioecy. The Botanical Review 63(1): 65-92. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02857918
Fuzeto, A. P.; A. A. A. Barbosa & C. Lomônoco. 2001. Cabralea canjerana subsp. politrychia (Adri. Juss.) Penn. (Meliaceae), a diocy specie. Acta Botanica Brasilica 15: 167-175. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062001000200003
Givnish, T. J. 1982. On the adaptive significance of leaf height in forest herbs. The American Naturalist 120: 353-81. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/283995
Groman, J. D. & O. Pellmyr. 1999. The pollination biology of Manfreda virginica (Agavaceae): relative contribution of diurnal and nocturnal visitors. Oikos 87: 373-381. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3546753
Harder, L. D. 1998. Pollen-size comparisons among animal-pollinated angiosperms with different pollination characteristics. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 64: 513-525. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1998.tb00347.x
Heinrich, B. & P. H. Raven. 1972. Energetics and pollination ecology. Science 176: 597-602. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.176.4035.597
Humeau, L.; T. Pailler & J. D. Thompson. 1999. Cryptic dioecy and lesky dioecy in endemic species of Dombeya (Sterculiaceae) on La Réunion. American Journal of Botany 86: 1437-1447. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2656925
Judd, W. S.; C. S. Campbell, E. Kellogg, P. Stevens & M. Donoghue. 2009. Sistemática Vegetal: Um enfoque filogenético, 3ª. ed. (trad.). Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Kearns, C. A. & D. W. Inouye. 1993. Techniques for Pollination Biologists. Niwot: University Press of Colorado.
Kearns, C. A. & D. W. Inouye. 1997. Pollinators, flowering plants, and conservation biology. BioScience 47(5): 298-307. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1313191
Lenzi, M & A. I. Orth. 2004. Fenologia reprodutiva, morfologia e biologia floral de Schinus terebinthifolius Radii (Anacardiaceae), em restinga da Ilha de Santa Catarina, Brasil. Biotemas 17: 67-89.
Li, A.; X. Wu, D. Zhang & S. C. H. Barrett. 2010. Cryptic dioecy in Mussaenda pubescens (Rubiaceae): a species with stigma-height dimorphism. Annals of Botany 106: 521-531. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq146
Lloyd, D. G. 1980. The distribution of gender in four angiosperm species illustrating two evolutionary pathways to dioecy. Evolution 34: 123-134. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2408321
Opler, P. A. & K. S. Bawa. 1978. Sex ratios in tropical forest trees. Evolution 32: 812-821. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2407496
Pennington, T. D.; B. D. Styles & D. A. H. Taylor. 1981. Meliaceae. Flora Neotropica Monograph 28: 235-244.
Primack R. B. 1985. Longevity of individual flowers. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16: 15-37. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.000311
Rathcke, B. J. & E. S. Jules. 1993. Habitat fragmentation and plant-pollinator interactions. Current Science 65(6): 273-276.
Renner, S. S. & R. E. Ricklefs. 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. American Journal of Botany 82: 596-606. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2445418
Rourke, J. P. 1989. The inflorescence morphology and systematics of Aulax (Proteaceae). South African Journal of Botany 53: 464-480.
Souza, L. A.; I. S. Moscheta, K. S. M. Mourão & A. Silvério. 2001. Morphology and Anatomy of the Flowers of Trichilia catigua A. Juss., T. elegans A. Juss. and T. pallida Sw. (Meliaceae). Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 44: 383-394. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132001000400008
Thomson, J. D. & S. C. H. Barret. 1981. Selection for outcrossing, sexual selection and evolution of dioecy in plants. The American Naturalist 118: 443-449. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/283837
Willmott, A. P. & A. Burquez. 1996. The pollination of Merremia palmeri (Convolvulaceae): Can hawk moths be trusted. American Journal of Botany 83: 1050-1056. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2445994
Willson, M. F. 1994. Sexual selection in plants: perspectives and overview. The American Naturalist 144: 13-39. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/285651
Young, H. 2002. Diurnal and nocturnal pollination of Silene alba (Caryophyllaceae). American Journal of Botany 89: 433-440. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.89.3.433
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

Starting on 2012, Darwiniana Nueva Serie uses Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 2.5 Argentina .