Functional dioecy and moth pollination in Cabralea canjerana subsp. canjerana (Meliaceae)

Authors

  • Edivani V. Franceschinelli Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás.
  • Roselaini M. do Carmo Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais.
  • Carlos de M. e Silva Neto Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás.
  • José N. Mesquita Neto Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás. Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14522/darwiniana.2015.31.599

Keywords:

Atlantic Forest, phalaenophily, plant sexual dimorphism

Abstract

Cabralea canjerana subsp. canjerana is a common species in the Atlantic Forest, occurring in several areas of this biome. Yet, little is known about its reproductive strategies. This study aims to understand the reproductive biology of this subspecies, including floral biology, sexual system, and pollination biology. Male and female plants have morphologically similar flowers, but male plants have larger inflorescences with more flowers than female plants. Female flowers remain open and receptive for two days, whereas male flowers last only one day; thus, compensating for the imbalance of the number of flowers per plant between the two sexes. Morphologically similar male and female flowers, as observed in C. canjerana subsp. canjerana, are rare among dioecious species. The high frequency of moths visiting the flowers, the timing of flower opening (anthesis) and the production of nectar suggest that moths are the pollinators of this subspecies. In contrast to the floral dimorphism found in C. canjerana subsp. polytrica, variations in floral morphology are unrelated to the plant sex in subsp. canjerana. This and other results found in this study suggest that the subspecies of C. canjerana might be different species.

Author Biography

Edivani V. Franceschinelli, Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás.

Professor Associado

Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás.

References

Barrett, S. C. H. 1992. Heterostylous genetic polymorphisms: model systems for evolutionary analysis, in S. C. H. Barrett (ed.), Evolution and function of heterostyly, pp. 1-24. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86656-2_1

Barrett, S. C. H. & J. Hough. 2013. Sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 64(1): 67-82. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers308

Bawa, K. S. 1980a. Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 15-39. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.000311

Bawa, K. S. 1980b. Mimicry of male by female flower and intrasexual competition for pollinators in Jacaratia dolichaula (D. Smith) woodson (Caricaceae). Evolution 34: 467-474. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2408216

Bawa, K. S. & P. A. Opler. 1975. Dioecism in tropical forest trees. Evolution 29: 167-179. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2407150

Bezerra, E. L. S. & I. C. Machado. 2003. Floral biology and pollination system of Solanum stramonifolium Jacq. (Solanaceae) in remaining of Atlantic Forest, Pernambuco. Acta Botanica Brasilica 17: 247-257. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062003000200007

Carmo, R. M. 2005. Biologia reprodutiva de Cabralea canjerana subsp. canjerana em fragmentos de Mata Atlântica do sul do estado Minas Gerais. Ph.D thesis, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Charlesworth, B. & D. Charlesworth. 1978. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. The American Naturalist 112: 975-997. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/283342

Cruden, R. W. 1977. Polen-ovule ratios: a conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants. Evolution 31: 32-46. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2407542

Cruden, R. W. 1988. Temporal dioecism, systematic breadth, associated traits and temporal patterns. The Botanical Gazzete 149: 1-15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/337684

Dafni, A. 1992. Pollination Ecology: A practical Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Delph, L. F.; L. F. Galloway & M. Stanton. 1996. Sexual dimorphism in flower size. The American Naturalist 148(2): 299-320. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/285926

Delph, L. F.; J. L. Gehring, A. M. Arntz, M. Levri & F. M. Frey. 2005. Genetic correlations with floral display lead to sexual dimorphism in the cost of reproduction. The American Naturalist 166: 31-41. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/444597

Eckhart, V. M. 1999. Sexual dimorphism in flowers and inflorescences, in M. A. Geber, T. E. Dawson & L. F. Delph (eds.), Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants, pp. 123-148. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03908-3_5

Faegri, K. & L.Van Der Pijl. 1979. The Principles of Pollination Ecology. New York: Pergamon Press.

França, G. S. & J. R. Stehmann. 2004. Floristic composition and structure of the tree component of a forest in the municipality of altimontana Camanducaia, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Botany 27: 19-30. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-84042004000100003

Freeman, C. D.; J. L. Doust, A. El-Keblawy, M. J. Kathleen & E. D. Mcarthur. 1997. Sexual specialization and inbreeding avoidance in the evolution of dioecy. The Botanical Review 63(1): 65-92. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02857918

Fuzeto, A. P.; A. A. A. Barbosa & C. Lomônoco. 2001. Cabralea canjerana subsp. politrychia (Adri. Juss.) Penn. (Meliaceae), a diocy specie. Acta Botanica Brasilica 15: 167-175. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062001000200003

Givnish, T. J. 1982. On the adaptive significance of leaf height in forest herbs. The American Naturalist 120: 353-81. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/283995

Groman, J. D. & O. Pellmyr. 1999. The pollination biology of Manfreda virginica (Agavaceae): relative contribution of diurnal and nocturnal visitors. Oikos 87: 373-381. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3546753

Harder, L. D. 1998. Pollen-size comparisons among animal-pollinated angiosperms with different pollination characteristics. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 64: 513-525. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1998.tb00347.x

Heinrich, B. & P. H. Raven. 1972. Energetics and pollination ecology. Science 176: 597-602. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.176.4035.597

Humeau, L.; T. Pailler & J. D. Thompson. 1999. Cryptic dioecy and lesky dioecy in endemic species of Dombeya (Sterculiaceae) on La Réunion. American Journal of Botany 86: 1437-1447. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2656925

Judd, W. S.; C. S. Campbell, E. Kellogg, P. Stevens & M. Donoghue. 2009. Sistemática Vegetal: Um enfoque filogenético, 3ª. ed. (trad.). Porto Alegre: Artmed.

Kearns, C. A. & D. W. Inouye. 1993. Techniques for Pollination Biologists. Niwot: University Press of Colorado.

Kearns, C. A. & D. W. Inouye. 1997. Pollinators, flowering plants, and conservation biology. BioScience 47(5): 298-307. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1313191

Lenzi, M & A. I. Orth. 2004. Fenologia reprodutiva, morfologia e biologia floral de Schinus terebinthifolius Radii (Anacardiaceae), em restinga da Ilha de Santa Catarina, Brasil. Biotemas 17: 67-89.

Li, A.; X. Wu, D. Zhang & S. C. H. Barrett. 2010. Cryptic dioecy in Mussaenda pubescens (Rubiaceae): a species with stigma-height dimorphism. Annals of Botany 106: 521-531. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq146

Lloyd, D. G. 1980. The distribution of gender in four angiosperm species illustrating two evolutionary pathways to dioecy. Evolution 34: 123-134. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2408321

Opler, P. A. & K. S. Bawa. 1978. Sex ratios in tropical forest trees. Evolution 32: 812-821. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2407496

Pennington, T. D.; B. D. Styles & D. A. H. Taylor. 1981. Meliaceae. Flora Neotropica Monograph 28: 235-244.

Primack R. B. 1985. Longevity of individual flowers. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16: 15-37. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.000311

Rathcke, B. J. & E. S. Jules. 1993. Habitat fragmentation and plant-pollinator interactions. Current Science 65(6): 273-276.

Renner, S. S. & R. E. Ricklefs. 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. American Journal of Botany 82: 596-606. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2445418

Rourke, J. P. 1989. The inflorescence morphology and systematics of Aulax (Proteaceae). South African Journal of Botany 53: 464-480.

Souza, L. A.; I. S. Moscheta, K. S. M. Mourão & A. Silvério. 2001. Morphology and Anatomy of the Flowers of Trichilia catigua A. Juss., T. elegans A. Juss. and T. pallida Sw. (Meliaceae). Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 44: 383-394. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132001000400008

Thomson, J. D. & S. C. H. Barret. 1981. Selection for outcrossing, sexual selection and evolution of dioecy in plants. The American Naturalist 118: 443-449. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/283837

Willmott, A. P. & A. Burquez. 1996. The pollination of Merremia palmeri (Convolvulaceae): Can hawk moths be trusted. American Journal of Botany 83: 1050-1056. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2445994

Willson, M. F. 1994. Sexual selection in plants: perspectives and overview. The American Naturalist 144: 13-39. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/285651

Young, H. 2002. Diurnal and nocturnal pollination of Silene alba (Caryophyllaceae). American Journal of Botany 89: 433-440. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.89.3.433

Published

31-07-2015

How to Cite

Franceschinelli, E. V., do Carmo, R. M., Silva Neto, C. de M. e, & Mesquita Neto, J. N. (2015). Functional dioecy and moth pollination in Cabralea canjerana subsp. canjerana (Meliaceae). Darwiniana, Nueva Serie, 3(1), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.14522/darwiniana.2015.31.599

Issue

Section

Reproductive Biology

Most read articles by the same author(s)